A few days ago I published Review for occasional services. As it turned out yesterday, equally critical of the regulation of traffic occasional comment on the Ombudsman.
In the Official Gazette released yesterday on Legal article, which describes the exchange of correspondence with representatives of the ROP Department of Transportation. He criticized the legislation, which in practice excludes the possibility of such business. in transport of artificial and stressed, that notwithstanding the freedom of business only to eliminate the phenomenon of impersonating a taxi, legislature acts contrary to the principle of proportionality. The same objective can be achieved by other means because, for example, through increased inspections of rogue traders. Unfortunately, the Ministry of transports does not seem to be approached with due seriousness to the arguments of the ROP and found, Wedding transportation that can still be made on the basis of Article. 33 Road Transport Act, on which the Commissioner has rightly pointed, that the provision of transport for their own purposes can not be applied to companies, their main activity are the occasional.
To sum up the attitude of the Ministry is not a good predictor of the chance to change the current regulation in the interests of persons providing transportation or hotel wedding.
2 Responses to RPO for occasional services